Japanese Steam reviews of Don't Starve Together: 90.0% positive, with complaints centred on gameplay
Players writing reviews in Japanese have given Don't Starve Together a 90.0% positive rating. This analysis covers 629 reviews collected between December 2014 and September 2026.
Own research by 648 News. Every figure in this article was counted by us from 629 Steam reviews written in Japanese, collected between 2014-12-16 and 2026-09-22.
The overall numbers
Players writing reviews in Japanese have submitted 629 ratings for Don't Starve Together. Of these, 566 recommend the title and 63 do not. The collected sample shows a 90.0% positive rate, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 87.4% to 92.1%. Steam lists the same 629 reviews in its own totals, also reporting a 90.0% positive score and a Very Positive label. The figures were read on October 17, 2026. All 629 reviews were successfully classified into topics.
The numbers
What reviewers praise
The most frequently praised topic is gameplay, combat, core mechanics, appearing in 44.7% of all classified reviews. Inside the recommending reviews, this topic accounts for 43.6% of the positive mentions. Players writing reviews in Japanese highlight the survival loop and character variety. Reviewers note the game offers a hard but rewarding experience for dedicated fans . Amount of content, length, replayability follows at 30.2% of classified reviews, representing 30.9% of positive mentions. Difficulty, balance is mentioned in 11.3% of classified reviews, making up 10.8% of positive feedback. Graphics, art direction appears in 5.2% of classified reviews and 5.5% of positive reviews. Online play, multiplayer, servers is discussed in 4.9% of classified reviews and 5.3% of positive reviews. Characters, character design covers 4.6% of classified reviews and 4.8% of positive reviews. Price, value for money, DLC pricing is noted in 1.9% of classified reviews and 2.1% of positive reviews. Story, scenario, writing appears in 1.7% of classified reviews and 1.9% of positive reviews. Japanese localization and translation quality is mentioned in 1.4% of classified reviews and 0.9% of positive reviews. UI, controls, key bindings, controller support covers 1.4% of classified reviews and 1.1% of positive reviews. Music, sound, voice acting appears in 0.3% of classified reviews and 0.4% of positive reviews. Developer or publisher conduct, update policy is mentioned in 0.2% of classified reviews and 0.2% of positive reviews.
不気味で可愛い世界観とキャラクターで行う、生き残りこそが最大の目的となる難易度の高いマルチプレイ可能なサバイバルゲームです。
A survival game with a creepy yet cute world and characters, where surviving is the main goal and the difficulty is high.
What reviewers criticise
Gameplay, combat, core mechanics dominates the negative feedback, appearing in 44.7% of all classified reviews but representing 54.0% of non-recommending reviews. Critics describe the survival loop as punishing and note that learning through repeated failure is a core design choice. Performance, optimization, bugs, crashes follows at 4.6% of classified reviews, making up 23.8% of negative mentions. Reviewers point out that high player counts can strain performance, particularly in cave areas. Difficulty, balance is mentioned in 11.3% of classified reviews and 15.9% of negative reviews. Players writing reviews in Japanese note that default settings require significant preparation before winter. Graphics, art direction appears in 5.2% of classified reviews and 3.2% of negative reviews. Online play, multiplayer, servers covers 4.9% of classified reviews and 1.6% of negative reviews. Characters, character design is noted in 4.6% of classified reviews and 3.2% of negative reviews. Japanese localization and translation quality appears in 1.4% of classified reviews and 6.3% of negative reviews. UI, controls, key bindings, controller support covers 1.4% of classified reviews and 4.8% of negative reviews. Price, value for money, DLC pricing is mentioned in 1.9% of classified reviews and 0.0% of negative reviews. Story, scenario, writing appears in 1.7% of classified reviews and 0.0% of negative reviews. Music, sound, voice acting covers 0.3% of classified reviews and 0.0% of negative reviews. Developer or publisher conduct, update policy is mentioned in 0.2% of classified reviews and 0.0% of negative reviews.
歴史のある見下ろし型のサバイバルゲーム。
A long-standing overhead-view survival game.
Who wrote these reviews
The median playtime behind these reviews is 39.1 hours. Players writing reviews in Japanese who recommend the game frequently discuss gameplay, combat, core mechanics, amount of content, length, replayability, and difficulty, balance. Those who do not recommend the game mention performance, optimization, bugs, crashes and Japanese localization and translation quality at higher rates relative to their overall counts. The collected reviews span from December 16, 2014 to September 22, 2026. This period coincides with the game's active update schedule. The median playtime of 39.1 hours reflects a substantial investment of time across multiple seasons. The positive rate of 90.0% aligns with Steam's own total figure.
Methodology and sources
Data
Steam user reviews, retrieved with Steam's public review listing between 2014-12-16 and 2026-09-22: 629 written in Japanese. Steam's own all-time totals for Don't Starve Together were read on 2026-10-17.
How the reviews were classified
Every review was read by a language model, which rated how positive it is, how much concrete detail it gives, and which of 15 fixed topics it talks about. The counts and percentages in this article were then computed from those labels in ordinary code, not by the model. Automatic classification makes mistakes, so single percentages should be read as approximate. Reviews of fewer than 15 characters were not sent to the model; they count as positive or negative from the reviewer's own recommendation and carry no topic.
Limits
People who write a Steam review in Japanese are not a representative sample of everyone who plays in Japan, and the language of a review does not establish where its author lives. Steam's default filter for off-topic review activity was left on, so periods Steam marked as review bombing are excluded from the counts in this article. Reviews that arrived after the retrieval date are not included.
Links
Data from Steam. Steam and the Steam logo are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Valve Corporation.