· Japan Reacts

DARK SOULS™: REMASTERED Japanese Steam reviews: 81.2% positive, gameplay praised

The count covers 750 players writing reviews in Japanese for the game. The period covers the game release and subsequent updates up to the collection date.

Own research by 648 News. Every figure in this article was counted by us from 750 Steam reviews written in Japanese, collected between 2018-05-24 and 2026-10-21.

Overall review volume and accuracy rating

The sample covers 750 players writing reviews in Japanese. Of these, 609 recommend the game and 141 do not, making the positive share 81.2 percent. Steam lists a total of 748 Japanese reviews for the whole history of the game. That figure shows a positive share of 81.3 percent. The 95 percent confidence interval for this sample ranges from 78.2 percent to 83.8 percent. This range aligns closely with the platform figure. The two counts are drawn from the same language pool and differ by two reviews. The sample was collected on 24 October 2026. Steam fetched its total on 23 October 2026.

The numbers

Share of Japanese-language reviews that mention each topicGameplay, combat, core mechanics56.3%Amount of content, length, replayability31.2%Difficulty, balance17.5%Performance, optimization, bugs, crashes13.9%Graphics, art direction10.8%Characters, character design8.3%UI, controls, key bindings, controller support7.7%Story, scenario, writing5.1%
Share of Japanese-language reviews that mention each topic
Topics inside recommending and inside not-recommending Japanese-language reviewsrecommendsdoes not recommendGameplay, combat, core mechanics54.8% (recommends)62.4% (does not recommend)Amount of content, length, replayability32.3% (recommends)26.2% (does not recommend)Difficulty, balance16.6% (recommends)21.3% (does not recommend)Performance, optimization, bugs, crashes8.4% (recommends)37.6% (does not recommend)Graphics, art direction10.5% (recommends)12.1% (does not recommend)Characters, character design9.4% (recommends)3.5% (does not recommend)UI, controls, key bindings, controller support4.6% (recommends)21.3% (does not recommend)Story, scenario, writing5.7% (recommends)2.1% (does not recommend)
Topics inside recommending and inside not-recommending Japanese-language reviews

Praise for core mechanics and exploration

Reviewers who recommend the game most frequently discuss gameplay, combat, and core mechanics. This topic appears in 54.8 percent of the recommending reviews. Players note that the frame rate makes movement noticeably lighter and reduces accidental deaths. They also appreciate the added bonfires and the shift to dedicated servers for matchmaking. Amount of content, length, and replayability is the second most common praise. It appears in 32.3 percent of the recommending reviews. Reviewers highlight the freedom to choose exploration routes and the satisfaction of overcoming challenging dungeons. They also point out that weapon variety is limited, which narrows build options. Difficulty and balance is mentioned in 16.6 percent of positive reviews. Players describe the difficulty as steep but fair, noting that enemy attack patterns are readable once memorized.

主にオリジナル版(リマスター元、無印・旧版)との比較レビュー

Mainly a comparison review with the original version

A Japanese-language Steam review (82.2 hours played, recommended)

Graphics and art direction appears in 10.5 percent of recommending reviews. Reviewers praise the dark fantasy atmosphere and the weight of the world design. Characters and character design is discussed in 9.4 percent of positive reviews. Players appreciate the intricate lore and the distinct visual style of the enemies.

色褪せないダークファンタジーなアクションRPGの傑作

A masterpiece of dark fantasy action RPG

A Japanese-language Steam review (155.7 hours played, recommended)

Story, scenario, and writing appears in 5.7 percent of recommending reviews. Readers value the environmental storytelling and the way item descriptions build the narrative. Online play, multiplayer, and servers appears in 3.0 percent of positive reviews. Reviewers note that dedicated servers improved matchmaking reliability.

Criticism of performance and controls

Players who do not recommend the game most often cite performance, optimization, bugs, and crashes. This topic appears in 37.6 percent of the non-recommending reviews. Reviewers point out frame rate drops near certain areas and lingering issues from the original release. They cite frame drops near large stone objects and occasional menu freezes. Gameplay, combat, and core mechanics is the second most criticized topic. It appears in 62.4 percent of the negative reviews. Reviewers describe the controls as outdated, noting long input delays and awkward camera work during tight spaces. UI, controls, key bindings, and controller support appears in 21.3 percent of non-recommending reviews. Players complain that running on Xbox controllers requires using the jump button, which conflicts with rolling. They note that key bindings match the third game, but camera speed requires manual adjustment. Difficulty and balance is mentioned in 21.3 percent of negative reviews. Reviewers feel the game punishes mistakes heavily and that some bosses rely on wide hitboxes rather than skill checks.

PS3でプレイ済みがちゃちゃっと2週クリアした感想。

My impression after quickly clearing it twice on PS3

A Japanese-language Steam review (79.1 hours played, not recommended)

Amount of content, length, and replayability is discussed in 26.2 percent of negative reviews. Players note that fast travel is limited for a large portion of the game, which slows down backtracking. Price, value for money, and DLC pricing appears in 3.5 percent of negative reviews. Players consider the asking price high given the lack of new content.

Playtime and what separates recommending reviews

The median playtime behind these reviews is 46.0 hours. Reviewers who recommend the game focus heavily on the core loop and exploration. Gameplay appears in 54.8 percent of positive reviews but drops to 62.4 percent among non-recommending reviews. Performance issues are mentioned in only 8.4 percent of positive reviews, yet they appear in 37.6 percent of negative reviews. This indicates that optimization problems are the primary driver of lower scores. Amount of content appears in 32.3 percent of positive reviews and 26.2 percent of negative reviews. This shows that length is generally viewed as a strength regardless of the final rating. UI and controls appear in 4.6 percent of positive reviews compared to 21.3 percent of negative reviews. The gap highlights how input responsiveness separates satisfied players from frustrated ones. Difficulty appears in 16.6 percent of positive reviews and 21.3 percent of negative reviews. Both groups acknowledge the steep challenge, but negative reviewers feel the balance leans too heavily on punishment. Characters and character design appears in 9.4 percent of positive reviews and 3.5 percent of negative reviews. Story, scenario, and writing appears in 5.7 percent of positive reviews and 2.1 percent of negative reviews. Graphics and art direction appears in 10.5 percent of positive reviews and 12.1 percent of negative reviews.

Methodology and sources

Data

Steam user reviews, retrieved with Steam's public review listing between 2018-05-24 and 2026-10-21: 750 written in Japanese. Steam's own all-time totals for DARK SOULS™: REMASTERED were read on 2026-10-23.

How the reviews were classified

Every review was read by a language model, which rated how positive it is, how much concrete detail it gives, and which of 15 fixed topics it talks about. The counts and percentages in this article were then computed from those labels in ordinary code, not by the model. Automatic classification makes mistakes, so single percentages should be read as approximate. Reviews of fewer than 15 characters were not sent to the model; they count as positive or negative from the reviewer's own recommendation and carry no topic.

Limits

People who write a Steam review in Japanese are not a representative sample of everyone who plays in Japan, and the language of a review does not establish where its author lives. Steam's default filter for off-topic review activity was left on, so periods Steam marked as review bombing are excluded from the counts in this article. Reviews that arrived after the retrieval date are not included.

Links

Data from Steam. Steam and the Steam logo are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Valve Corporation.